ElmsPark Guides
Claude models

Claude Fable 5vsClaude Opus 4.8

Anthropic shipped two flagship models within a fortnight. This guide explains what Fable 5 actually is, how it differs from Opus 4.8, what each costs, and which one to reach for.

Fable 5 launched 9 June 2026 Opus 4.8 launched 28 May 2026 Guide compiled 10 June 2026

The thirty-second version

Fable 5 is not an Opus upgrade. It is a new, higher tier. Anthropic calls it a Mythos-class model: a class that sits above Opus entirely. Fable 5 is the first Mythos-class model anyone can use, made safe for general release by wrapping it in strict safety classifiers.

+10%
Fable beats Opus 4.8 by more than ten points on some benchmarks. The longer the task, the bigger its lead.
2x
Fable costs double Opus 4.8 on the API: $10/$50 vs $5/$25 per million tokens in/out.
<5%
of sessions trigger Fable's safeguards. Those queries get answered by Opus 4.8 instead.

How the family fits together now

Mythos class (new top tier) Mythos Preview (Apr, invitation-only) → Fable 5 (public, safeguarded) and Mythos 5 (same model, safeguards lifted, Project Glasswing partners only)
Opus class Opus 4.8, the everyday flagship. Also the safety net: Fable falls back to it on restricted topics
Sonnet and Haiku Sonnet 4.6 for speed-plus-intelligence, Haiku 4.5 for fast cheap work. Unchanged by these launches
Time-sensitive: Fable 5 is included on Pro, Max, Team and seat-based Enterprise plans at no extra cost only until 22 June 2026. From 23 June it needs usage credits (Anthropic aims to restore it as standard later). If you are on a paid plan, give it a proper run on something hard before then.

Naming, briefly

Fable and Mythos 5 are the same underlying model. Fable (from the Latin fabula, "that which is told", akin to the Greek mythos) is the safeguarded public version; Mythos 5 is the unrestricted version reserved for vetted cyber defenders. The safeguards are the only difference, hence the two names.

Mythos class · released 9 June 2026

What is Claude Fable 5?

Anthropic's most capable model ever made generally available. State of the art on nearly all tested benchmarks across software engineering, knowledge work, vision and scientific research, and built to run autonomously for longer than any previous Claude.

The back-story

In April 2026 Anthropic built a model so capable in areas like cybersecurity that it would not release it publicly. That model, Claude Mythos Preview, went only to vetted cyber defenders and critical-infrastructure providers under Project Glasswing, run in collaboration with the US government (expanded to roughly 150 organisations across 15+ countries on 2 June). Fable 5 is that class of capability finally made public, with hard safety limits bolted on. The release also landed days after Anthropic publicly urged AI labs to agree a coordinated brake on frontier development, warning of recursive self-improvement, and as the company prepares for an IPO.

What it's notably good at

Software engineering

Stripe reported Fable performed a codebase-wide migration across a 50-million-line Ruby codebase in a day; by hand it would have taken a team over two months. Highest frontier score on Cognition's FrontierCode, even at medium effort. State of the art on CursorBench.

Vision

New state of the art. Extracts precise numbers from dense scientific figures and can rebuild a web app's source code from screenshots alone. Completed Pokémon FireRed using raw screenshots only, no helper harness, something earlier Claudes could not do even with one.

Memory and long context

Stays focused across millions of tokens and improves its work using its own notes. Given file-based memory in Slay the Spire, its performance gain was three times larger than Opus 4.8's.

Knowledge work

Highest score of any model on Hebbia's senior-level Finance Benchmark. First model to break 90% on Hex's analytics benchmark, a ten-point jump over Opus. Strong document, chart and table reasoning.

The safeguards (the bit that makes it "Fable")

Separate classifier AIs watch every request. When one detects a restricted topic, Opus 4.8 answers instead of Fable, and you're told when that happens. Anthropic has deliberately tuned them cautiously, so they will occasionally catch harmless requests. They trigger in under 5% of sessions; 95%+ of sessions run entirely on Fable.

1. Cybersecurity

Mythos-class models excel at discovering and exploiting software vulnerabilities, plus agentic hacking (reconnaissance, lateral movement and so on). The classifiers block both exploitation and broader offensive cyber tasks. One external partner found Fable's cyber safeguards the most robust of any model tested: zero compliance with harmful single-turn requests, with or without 30 public jailbreak techniques.

2. Biology and chemistry

Tuned very broadly for now: most bio and chem requests fall back to Opus 4.8, because Mythos-class models showed real ability in dual-use tasks such as viral design prediction. A trusted access programme will give vetted biomedical researchers a version with these safeguards removed. Anthropic says it wants to narrow the false positives quickly.

3. Distillation

Requests flagged as attempts to extract Fable's capabilities to train competing models (Anthropic has identified large-scale attempts from authoritarian countries) also fall back to Opus 4.8.

Jailbreak testing

An external bug bounty produced no universal jailbreaks in over 1,000 hours. External red-teaming organisations also failed on long-form agentic tasks, although the UK AISI made progress towards one in a brief initial window. Anthropic's stated goal is to make any remaining jailbreaks slow and costly enough to detect before they're used at scale.

New: mandatory 30-day data retention

All Mythos-class traffic now carries compulsory 30-day retention, even for business customers with previous zero-retention agreements. Anthropic says the data won't train models and is used only to defend against novel attacks and reduce false positives, with human access logged. Worth knowing if you ever route client-sensitive material through Fable.

Availability

Opus class · released 28 May 2026

Claude Opus 4.8 recap

The everyday flagship. An upgrade to Opus 4.7 (which it followed by just 41 days), stronger across coding, agentic tasks, reasoning and professional work, at an unchanged price.

4x
less likely than Opus 4.7 to let flaws in its own code pass unremarked. Honesty was the headline improvement.
$5/$25
per million tokens in/out, unchanged from 4.7. Fast mode (2.5x speed) is $10/$50, three times cheaper than before.
1M
token context window with 128k max output, same headline figures as Fable 5.

What arrived with it

Why it matters in this comparison: Opus 4.8 is not the loser here. It is half Fable's price, has no classifier fallbacks, no mandatory retention policy, full subscription availability, and it's the model Fable itself hands over to on restricted topics. For most day-to-day work it remains the sensible default.

Head to head

Rows where they differ are tinted. Use the button to hide everything they share.

FeatureFable 5Opus 4.8
Model classMythos class (new top tier)Opus class
Released9 June 202628 May 2026
API IDclaude-fable-5claude-opus-4-8
API price (per MTok in/out)$10 / $50$5 / $25
Fast modeNot offered$10 / $50 at 2.5x speed
Context window1M tokens1M tokens (200k on MS Foundry)
Max output128k tokens128k tokens (300k via batch beta)
ThinkingAdaptive, always onAdaptive (effort defaults to high)
BenchmarksState of the art nearly everywhere; 10%+ ahead on some tests; lead grows with task lengthStrongest Opus yet; beaten by Fable on most tests
Restricted-topic behaviourCyber, bio/chem and distillation queries fall back to Opus 4.8 (<5% of sessions)No fallback system; standard safety training
Data retentionMandatory 30 days, even over zero-retention agreementsStandard policies, zero-retention possible
Subscription accessIncluded on Pro/Max/Team/Enterprise seats until 22 June, then usage creditsStandard on paid plans
Sibling modelMythos 5: same model, cyber safeguards lifted, Glasswing onlyNone
Multimodal inputText + imageText + image

Third-party verdicts on Fable vs Opus

Timeline

Cost calculator

API list prices, June 2026. Enter a workload in millions of tokens and compare. (Subscription plans draw on allocation rather than these per-token prices, but the ratios still tell you how fast each model burns it.)

Allocation logic on subscription plans: if Fable burns roughly double Opus per token, a sensible ladder is Haiku for simple automation, Sonnet 4.6 for routine work, Opus 4.8 for complex jobs, and Fable 5 saved for the genuinely hard, long-horizon ones (bundled at no extra cost until 22 June).

Which model, when?

Tap a job type for a recommendation.

Pick a task above
Recommendations assume a developer on a paid Claude plan working through Claude Code or Cowork.

Rules of thumb